I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 since the main-stream news have actually guaranteed extremely few individuals understand the information regarding the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have already been arrested within the united kingdom in the first place while there is no situation, with no genuine research. Look at this and also you shall understand why.
One other thing maybe maybe not widely recognized will there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The only real general public part is the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge and two advisers directly appointed by governmental events. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend exactly just how clearly the full instance is a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe not warn Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood within the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking pink cashmere sweater she had used right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being likely to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply trying to find Assange:
“He’s not right right right here. He’s planned to own intercourse utilizing the cashmere woman every night, not managed to make it. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault so serious she had been prepared to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She ended up being also to mention that this attack involved enforced sex that is unprotected she was concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And exactly why had been Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a tremendously brief survey for the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press meeting organised with a branch associated with the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange in addition they have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into assault by surreptitious mutilation regarding the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at his press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to visit a crayfish party, anybody have a couple of available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to find a crayfish party fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting outside at 02:00 and barely freezing with all the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, sleep once again in equivalent solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep when you look at the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not warn her of prospective intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to dominate housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is concerned about STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that xxxstreams com is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own police declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had non-safe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom to your authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA upon it, as well as its evidently unused.
No witness has arrived forward to express that Ardin complained of intimate assault by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not grumble of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
Therefore ordinary this 1 of a few things occurred:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but did not warn Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, behave as his press secretary, and rest in identical bed with him, refusing duplicated provides to support him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the utilization of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale as a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape rules. Wilen declined to signal.
In the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she had been “shocked once they arrested JA because I just desired him to have a test”.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it was law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then comprised her story that is own of attack. As many buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe perhaps perhaps not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event for the torn condom. However the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange onto it. Its impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
I’ve no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her behalf story to be real involves acceptance of behavior that is, within the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that does not matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place completely in key. There’s absolutely no jury, while the national federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he can fade away into prison, the test is going to be key, and also the the next thing you are going to hear is the fact that he is accountable and a rapist.
Secondly, needless to say, it doesn’t matter evidence is indeed poor, as in order to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has succeeded in destroying most of the work and life of Assange. The main points for the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line it is incorrect also to look at evidence. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that the best way to test these issues is with in court, I would personally state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and now we should definitely condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.